Mayan Plumbing Found In Ancient City 220
DarkKnightRadick writes "An archaeologist and a hydrologist have published evidence that the ancient Mayans had pressurized plumbing as early as sometime between the year 100 (when the city of Palenque in Chiapas, Mexico, was first founded) and 800 (when it was abandoned). While the Egyptians had plumbing way earlier (around 2500 BC), this is the first instance of plumbing in the New World prior to European exploration and conquest."
Better than ours? (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
So any /.ers want to volunteer to jump into the volcano?
Re: (Score:2)
only the ugly ones
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Getting rid of ugly virgins? What kind of sacrifice is that?
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of outside as well. :-P
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't say that on Slashdot!
Some people might get nervous around here....
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Don't say that on Slashdot!
Some people might get nervous around here....
sacrificing a slashdot nerd would most certainly not be my first choice for appeasing the gods. Think of the stench wafting up from that pasty white unwashed skin and oily hair.
Re: (Score:2)
But if you had pasty white hair and oily skin...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They used male virgins, who are dime a dozen, both now and then.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The "shoddy contractors" theory of water temperature problems is actually just a lie promulgated as part of the post-colonization suppression of native mythology.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
However, even today we see some cultures who shit in the water that they drink. India is one such culture, and it's prevalent in Africa, too.
I thought it was people shitting in the water upstream from where 'somebody else' drinks.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Informative)
It usually takes a large amount of death/discomfort/destruction for things to change unfortunately. Especially with such a large public works project such as sanitation and clean water.
All though the Thames still stinks, I'm sure that it used to be much, much, much worse than even India at the time.
Re:Better than ours? (Score:4, Informative)
Even more important to improving sanitation than death, discomfort, and destruction was the concept of germs which was only just gaining traction in the late 19th century.
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Informative)
you mean it was re-gaining traction. Funny how it took western civilization over 1500 years to get back to where medicine was at the peak of the Roman Empire. Marcus Varro, 36 B.C. "and because there are bred certain minute creatures which cannot be seen by the eyes, which float in the air and enter the body through the mouth and nose and there cause serious diseases". Other Roman doctors know to use antiseptics and antibiotics, and knew of germs/viruses by indirect means. Of course, 600 years before that, Indian civilization knew and wrote of living infectious agents they couldn't see , and had drugs and procedure to kill them and to inoculate.
But in the mid 19th century U.S. physicians were putting leaches on Abraham Lincoln, the primitive morons.
Re:Better than ours? (Score:4, Insightful)
The question is, did those ancient Roman and Indian physicians actually know about germs, or were they just making a lucky guess? Without a microscope, the idea of "miasma" ("bad air") as an explanation for infectious disease, which was popular up through the 19th c., actually makes just about as much sense as germ theory. So I'd be interested to know the process by which the ancients arrived at their conclusion -- unless they devised some very clever experiments, they didn't really know what they were dealing with.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagination isn't the same thing as inference. The fact that they could imagine germs, and for that matter atoms, doesn't mean that they actually knew such things existed in the same sense that we know today that they exist. Now, obviously, we can in fact infer the existence of things we can't see, and we have a well-established process for doing just that. I'm mainly curious as to how far back that process goes; the body of practices that we now call "the scientific method" is generally dated to the lat
Re: (Score:2)
They did both come up with the idea of the atom [wikipedia.org], after all.
Atomism is a greek concept, not Roman, also, it was not a commonly accepted theory, far less so than say elements/humours.
You can easily over-interpret translations of older texts; that text by Varro could just as easily have been talking about dust mites rather than viruses/bacteria. I don't think it's fair to compare speculation in this case with the more thorough understanding we have of bacteria.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Romans and Greeks knew full well that dirty water spreads disease. That is why they went to such extraordinary lengths to gather water high in the mountains and pipe it through the cities. Their civil engineers did not need microscopes to figure that out.
And right now there are still countries where people take water in the spring that comes to their house and clean their ass and throw their garbage in the the same spring, for the next house 20m below to enjoy. This kind of logic baffles the mind.
I often wonder where we would be if the greco-romans had the idea to use steam power... (Heron knew steam could be used on a small scale, but never thought 'bigger'). Their society was happy to rely on slaves I guess...
Re: (Score:2)
Knowing that dirty water spreads disease isn't the same thing as knowing why it spreads disease. Sanitation can be observed to be effective without any explanation of the underlying mechanism. My question is, did Varro and his Indian predecessors actually have evidence for their pathogen hypothesis, or did they simply pick the one of several possible explanations that happened to be right? If the former, I'd very interested to know what it was -- it's always fascinating when some bit of scientific knowle
Re: (Score:2)
I might be totally wrong here but didn't the harnessing of larger scale steam power rely on the invention of stronger metals and forging processes which were discovered after their time?
Still, it definitely would have made the world a different place.
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Insightful)
The question is, did those ancient Roman and Indian physicians actually know about germs, or were they just making a lucky guess?
But you can apply such an argument to anybody who doesn't have all the facts. Did Robert Boyle know, for certain, that gases were composed of minute particles, the kinetics of which could be used to derive his "Boyle's Law?" He did not. In the same sense as you are now implying, he made a "lucky guess." A guess which turned out to be correct, and his name has survived in history even though, in modern terms, he didn't know what the fuck he was talking about.
If somebody posits that minute organisms are the ultimate cause of disease, then I give that person props. I really don't give a shit that he cannot prove whether he's right. That fact is, he IS right. You attitude smacks of the bitterness of a person who has perpetually sought success but never achieved it. Whatever.
Re:Better than ours? (Score:5, Insightful)
Boyle's laws can be confirmed by experiment without knowledge of the kinetics; he wasn't just guessing, he was formulating a model based on his observations. With regards to infectious disease, this is roughly equivalent to sanitary practices, which can be shown to work without an underlying knowledge of germ theory. But if you're going to propose a mechanism -- the behavior of gas molecules in the first case, that of infectious microorganisms in the second -- then unless you have some kind of evidence, then yes, it's a lucky guess. There is a reason why "model" and "theory" are two different words. Note that I'm not claiming models aren't useful; of course they are. But they do not lead to understanding of the underlying mechanisms in and of themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Reading the actual document he was warning about tiny airborne animals and recommended avoiding living near, or building on high ground (in good air), or so that the prevailing winds did not blow from the swamp ...
Sounds like the miasma theory by another name .... which works because generally Bad air does mean disease
The London Sewers were built because of the miasma theory, not germ theory (which came later).... and worked ....
Just because a theory is wrong does not mean it doesn't work, and if it works i
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
" Funny how it took western civilization over 1500 years to get back to where medicine was at the peak of the Roman Empire. Marcus Varro, 36 B.C."
Blame Christianity.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Last time I checked the Bible, the old testament has passages about to bury your feces, not to make love with a menstruating woman, and some other common sense stuff. Heck, do you have any idea why Jews and Muslims don't eat pork?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
But in the mid 19th century U.S. physicians were putting leaches on Abraham Lincoln, the primitive morons.
Don't forget that its widely believe Lincoln would have recovered to some degree, albeit with a bullet in his head, had it not been for his doctors constantly running metal probes and even their fingers into his brain while he was incapacitated.
It was actually Lincoln's doctors, literally, who were the instrument of death.
Re: (Score:2)
with a very weak black powder charge behind it and 2-1/2" barrel, the 44 cal Philadelphia Deringer's wounds should have been highly survivable. Lincoln lived for 9 hours, maybe the doctors killed him with their bloodletting.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ideally, we would have had plumbing as soon as we stopped being nomads. Unfortunately, we had to deal with centuries (millennia?) of filthy people who shat
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Whew. Good thing we're more civilized in North America.
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/6-12-5/48967.html [epochtimes.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, yes: because pissing in the ocean is the same as shitting in your soup. You're a real intellectual giant, aren't you?
Re: (Score:2)
Ever smelled certain of the Great Lakes? They're not exactly an ocean.
But then I guess you'd know all about it, since someone obviously pissed in your cornflakes this morning.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever smelled certain of the Great Lakes?
Is that even English?
They're not exactly an ocean.
It's called an "analogy", numbnuts.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
All joking aside, Native Americans both in North and South America had rather terrible sanitation systems, even by the standards of their day. It was not unusual for them to defecate around the fire pits where they cooked and ate.
All my modding in this thread will be wasted now, but I don't have a mod named
[citation needed]
I've never heard Mayans called the "Native Americans" of South America.
Re: (Score:2)
With all the home repairs I've done over the last few years, "shoddy/lazy" work isn't the exception, it's the norm. I'd be delighted to find well thought out and designed work than the crap that they've been building for the last couple decades.
3/4" pipe coming into the bathroom would be one of those examples. You *may* have 3/4" pipe coming in there, but you'll have 1/2" pipe coming in between the meter and the house. I've installed quite a few whole house water filtration
No big surprise,,, (Score:3, Interesting)
If the aliens gave pluming to the Egyptians, why not the Mayans?
Re: (Score:2)
No, not plumbing:
from the series-of-tubes dept.
Clearly, the aliens gave them both the internet! If only Senator Stevens had been an Egyptologist, we would have known sooner...
Re: (Score:2)
Because travellers from the future got to the Mayans before the aliens. So aliens had to settle on Egyptians.
pattern? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:pattern? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is it just coincidence that advanced cultures tend to go under within a couple of centuries after they invent plumbing?
Cultures go under all the time, with or without plumbing.
are we doomed?
Most certainly.
Re:pattern? (Score:5, Insightful)
Barring fairly rare events(like the sudden appearance of really nasty plagues, or an advanced culture showing up and gunning you down, or both), low-complexity cultures don't really "collapse" in any useful sense. They wax and wane a bit, some years good some years bad, and they may undergo various sorts of linguistic and genetic shifts due to warfare and migration; but they aren't specialized enough for things to really go to hell.
If you have interlocking specialization, though, you have entire institutions, and populations, that are basically dependent on large numbers of other structures and people for their continued existence. This makes it fairly easy for the right push to, instead of "reducing the hunter-gatherer population by ~10%" do something more along the lines of "catastrophic mass starvation, entire cities abandoned to the flames, the capital investments of 200 years annihilated within months".
Re: (Score:2)
"catastrophic mass starvation, entire cities abandoned to the flames, the capital investments of 200 years annihilated within months".
Oh please, 2009 wasn't that bad.
Re:pattern? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
half-duplex rfc1149 link.
You mean you only have ONE pigeon? I thought you needed two for bidirection communication. Are Mayan pigeons more advanced than ours?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, spoken langauges don't die off in short periods of time. Given the available compute power a
Re: (Score:2)
What'll be different, I think, is that a lot less information will be lost in the demise of a "modern" culture simply due to the global (that's the key word here) communications network and data archival abilities we now possess. If the US went into oblivion, the world wouldn't have to re-invent the Ford Model-T or "Freedom Fries"; That data will be quite difficult to get rid of due to geographic redundancy.
Also, spoken langauges don't die off in short periods of time. Given the available compute power and potential advances in translation software, it should be relively easy to bring texts up to the new language. You won't need a giant rock and guys like Daniel Jackson spouting some Goa'uld nonsense.
If you can't read Shakespeare in English, what's the point? Dante's Inferno becomes a work of intellect and story and loses all poetic meaning.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the U.S. does not maintain its current position of dominance for at least the next 20 y
Re: (Score:2)
When I was in grad school at Columbia, I lived in a Harlem sub-let that had plumbing from about about 100 C.E.
I seem to recall some Mayan hieroglyphs around the front door, too. They translated as "Manny is a fuggin' puto"
I don't know about the culture of New York, but those few years almost put me under. You could buy seven dollar bags of brown heroin in my building day or night. That, and the cockroaches the size of nutria did not make for an atm
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, for those innocent years when we thought we could solve the world's problems by breakdancing.
Re: (Score:2)
I seem to recall some Mayan hieroglyphs around the front door, too. They translated as "Manny is a fuggin' puto"
That must have been that bastard Ah Kin Xoc. He's been calling "Manny" (Mulac) a puto for years now, ever since he caught him banging Hun-Hunapu in the men's room at the Port Authority Bus Terminal.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Some people believe that toilets don't allow for complete elimination and are the source of a lot of colon cancer [toilet-rel...lments.com].
For my part, I've realized that after a lot of years camping and having to squat over a hole I dig, that at some point my knees simply won't let me do that any more. I've come to believe that maybe people die younger in parts of the world that lack sit down toilets and remember this quote by Charles Bukowski:
Sex is interesting, but it's not totally important. I mean it's not even as important (p
Re: (Score:2)
Some people believe that toilets don't allow for complete elimination and are the source of a lot of colon cancer.
This is true, but plumbing ans sewer systems != sit-down toilets.
IIRC, modern sit-down toilets were invented by John C. Crapper sometime in the 1700s. I could look this up and link this to wikipedia, but my karma is good enough.
So all these ancient civilizations we're hearing about that had plumbing systems -- Egypt, the Indus valley, the Mayans, Rome -- they were all still squatting to take
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it just coincidence that advanced cultures tend to go under within a couple of centuries after they invent plumbing?
I’ll make it short:
Yes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:pattern? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Six easy steps to avert collapse of civilization (Score:3, Interesting)
Okay, not really related to ancient Mayan plumbing, but that article did make me think about this great talk by neuroscientist and writer David Eagleman:
http://www.longnow.org/seminars/02010/apr/01/six-easy-steps-avert-collapse-civilization/ [longnow.org]
Pretty Neat (Score:4, Interesting)
The guy who has the photo credit in the article (Kirk French) was my Archaeology TA during my freshman year. (I'm currently attending PSU for an EE degree). He's a really cool guy, glad to see he's doing well.
That aside, this is actually a pretty big discovery; very few ancient civilizations actually managed complex engineering achievements like running water. If anything this just adds to the mystery, if they had engineering knowledge of similar level to the Romans, why did their civilization suddenly die out?
Re: (Score:2)
Still not similar, it seems. And don't we have a sensibly clear image of what happened with their civilisation? (certain stagnation to some degree, also perhaps due to wasting of human resources; and locked into delicate, almost ceremonial balance with other local powers...a state which was rapidly destabilised by arrival of Europeans?)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The theory that was told to me by Mayans, and confirmed by several online sources, is that of severe drought, exacerbated by deforestation. It seems that most large tribes split, smaller ones formed, and perhaps some small villages existed in a relative state of anarchy. By the time the Europeans arrived, there were still (or again) some larger tribes. Of course, the Mayans still live today, both ethnically and -- to a degree -- culturally.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, what happened to Roman civilization? (Score:3, Interesting)
Probably much like Roman civilization, the main power structure lost control. That seems to be recurring throughout all history and cultures.
Obviously that's a huge simplification, but it no doubt contributed to the "collapse" of their civilization. I put "collapse" in parentheses, because Mayan civilization still exists to a certain degree.
Re:Pretty Neat (Score:4, Interesting)
Technology(speaking in the broad sense, including things like complex social structures, bureaucracies, and so forth) is extremely powerful; but also makes it fairly easy to get locked-in to brittle trajectories where(even if alternatives are theoretically possible), your only real approach to any problem becomes "do whatever it is we already do; but more, and harder". This often goes poorly. Worse, you have usually managed to build a population that depends on your complex social structures, which makes for a fun die-off if they should come loose.
When the Roman legions stopped being a net gain, through plunder and Romanization, and started to become a liability(since they couldn't expand the borders any further, and spent most of their time fighting civil wars to install one emperor after another), Roman civilization as a whole never really came up with an alternative. They pretty much just raised more, tried harder, passed a few more laws to try to preserve the status quo. Long-view, they were following a doomed path, proximately, though, they didn't really have a whole lot of options. Any emperor who adopted a "fewer legions" policy would find himself replaced with extreme prejudice by somebody willing to do the opposite.
I don't know how the Mayans went down; but complexity quite possibly helped them along.
Re:Pretty Neat (Score:5, Insightful)
Any emperor who adopted a "fewer legions" policy would find himself replaced with extreme prejudice by somebody willing to do the opposite.
For some reason, I'm having mental images of Roman legions marching through Iraq and Afghanistan, with predator drones buzzing overhead.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Is it really that different from the Vikings, given the Nordic experiments in international trade? The British Empire also ran out of places to invade and ran out of ways to pay for a gigantic military infrastructure. If you look at the Hittite Empire, we still don't know much about the collapse other than their expansion started to decline and they plunged into a bunch of civil wars soon after.
I'm going to offer the following conjecture: that ANY militaristic power above a certain size, in order to survive
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, the more I hear about ancient civilizations, the more I believe that in at least some regards, they had knowledge that was lost to the West until sometime after the Renaissance. They didn't know everything, but they sure as shit knew a lot. Certainly a lot more than has been attributed to them during most of my lifetime.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The History channel's Modern Marvels nearly always provides a reference to the ancient rome.
So much so that a running joke amongst my friends is that when Modern Marvel's eventually covers the "data center" they will likely mention it was first invented by the Romans.
42 (Score:2)
They unwisely got rid of all the telephone sterilizer technicians.
Re: (Score:2)
First of all: There are still 6.1 million Mayans around. Mostly in Yucatán, Guatemala (40% of the population!), Belize (10%), and Honduras.
I've seen numbers from 10~13 million bandied about as the peak population of the Mayan civilization before their crash.
Considering that 90~95% of them died during the population crash...
It took 1,000 years for between 500K to 1.3 million Mayans to grow to the 6.1 million you claim are around today.
Re: (Score:2)
It’s actually not me claiming that. It’s the German Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya#Die_Maya_heute [wikipedia.org]
I basically just quoted the first sentence of that section.
Which itself does have the information from here: http://www.ethnologue.com/15/show_family.asp?subid=90711 [ethnologue.com]
The links an square brackets contain the population counts.
Where do you have your numbers from?
Re:Pretty Neat (Score:4, Insightful)
One wonders how something that happened in 1492 could cause the Classic Maya collapse, which happened around 800. Did they discover time travel in 1492?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe the OP was making the common mistake of personifying the system instead of the people. That is common these days. However, the classic maya vanished before that, around 800 C.E. While the people didn't actually 'vanish', their way of life did. While it is possible that the maya became victims of their own overgrowth like the romans, subject to the law of diminishing returns, it seems more plausible they ju
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that's quite true. I play soccer with a couple in fact.
However, classical Mayan civilization actually had writing. By the time Europian explorers "discovered" them, there was lots of old written material lying around, but nobody still living in the area knew how to read any of it. The culture in that area at the time was quite illiterate. Going from literacy to illiteracy qualifies as a cultural collapse to most folks.
Of course, given the Spanish's attitude towards the codexes (they considered them
History of the World Part I (Score:3, Funny)
"Pump the shit, right out of your house!"
Next on Ghost Hunters... (Score:2)
In ancient Mayan sewers, the team comes face-to-face with the ghosts of Mayan Roto-Rooter men!
Ironic, true, but still a load of crap...
archaeologist + hydrologist = (Score:2)
.
So if the Mayan's had plumbing (Score:2)
may I assume they originated the plumber's butt crack?
So you're saying... (Score:2)
Their civilization went down the tubes?
Re:SOLUTION? DEPORT ALL MUSLIMIICS (Score:4, Interesting)
Get them out before we have to endure more imcompetence. Is it any wonder the middle east is 3rd world? Those towelheads are to stipud to make a bumb even!
Careful, there. I have posted all sorts of horrible depraved "nigger" jokes, "Jew" jokes, and the like, and not one thing happened. Then I posted a joke about Muslims and Mohammad and *bam*, suddenly my IP address was blocked from Slashdot for several days. Slashdot even has a nice little webpage telling you that you've been blocked. Apparently the PC crowd has a lot of rampant favoritism, especially when one particular group gets its panties in a wad and bitches up a storm about everything a hell of a lot more than the others. Isn't it funny how it's considered cool to bash Christians and Judaeo-Christian beliefs in the media and Christians are expected to be adult enough to accept it and deal with it, but you make one negative remark about Islam and it suddenly doesn't work that way? AND no one sees this as a hypocritical double standard that needs to go?
Re: (Score:2)
but you make one negative remark about Islam and it suddenly doesn't work that way?
Sure... They don't want their data centers to get bombed.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's hypocritical to an extent, but then again, the Jews and Christians typically don't threaten to kill you or follow through on their threats. I blame the moderate Muslims who say almost nothing against their extremist brethren. Other Christians put George Tiller in jail. Why is Osama still free?
Re: (Score:2)
Er, George Tiller's killer. I should really use the Preview button for previewing.
Re: (Score:2)
Get them out before we have to endure more imcompetence. Is it any wonder the middle east is 3rd world? Those towelheads are to stipud to make a bumb even!
Careful, there. I have posted all sorts of horrible depraved "nigger" jokes, "Jew" jokes, and the like, and not one thing happened. Then I posted a joke about Muslims and Mohammad and *bam*, suddenly my IP address was blocked from Slashdot for several days. Slashdot even has a nice little webpage telling you that you've been blocked. Apparently the PC crowd has a lot of rampant favoritism, especially when one particular group gets its panties in a wad and bitches up a storm about everything a hell of a lot more than the others. Isn't it funny how it's considered cool to bash Christians and Judaeo-Christian beliefs in the media and Christians are expected to be adult enough to accept it and deal with it, but you make one negative remark about Islam and it suddenly doesn't work that way? AND no one sees this as a hypocritical double standard that needs to go?
Wow, that's really interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. Racist shitheads get smarter and smarter every day.
Unless he's reverse astroturfing.